4.8 Article

Confronting Sulfur Electrode Passivation and Li Metal Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Using Thiocyanate Anion

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202301006

Keywords

acceptor number; Gutmann donor number; Li+ solvation shell; Li3N-rich SEI layer; lithium sulfur batteries; thiocyanate anions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new class of salt anion, thiocyanate (SCN-), is presented, which shows a strong Li+ coordination and direct interaction with polysulfide anions. This electrolyte significantly enhances the solubility of lithium polysulfides and promotes 3D Li2S formation. It also forms a Li3N-enriched stable SEI layer on the surface of Li metal electrode, improving cycling stability.
Salt anions with a high donor number (DN) enable high sulfur utilization in lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries by inducing three-dimensional (3D) Li2S growth. However, their insufficient compatibility with Li metal electrodes limits their cycling stability. Herein, a new class of salt anion, thiocyanate (SCN-), is presented, which features a Janus character of electron donor and acceptor. Due to a strong Li+ coordination by SCN- and the direct interaction of SCN- with polysulfide anions, the LiSCN electrolyte has a remarkably high lithium polysulfide solubility. This electrolyte induces 3D Li2S formation and ameliorates cathode passivation, even more than Br-, a typical high DN anion. Moreover, SCN- forms a Li3N-enriched stable SEI layer at the surface of the Li metal electrode, enhancing cycling stability. A Li-S battery with the LiSCN electrolyte shows high current density operation (2.54 mA cm(-2)) with high discharge capacity (1133 mAh g(-1)) and prolonged cycle life (100 cycles). This work demonstrates that the cathode and anode performance in a Li-S battery can be simply and concurrently enhanced by the single salt anion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available