4.6 Article

Substrate-Free Transfer of Large-Area Ultra-Thin Electronics

Journal

ADVANCED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202201281

Keywords

flexible electronics; substrate-free; transfer techniques; ultra-thin electronics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Innovation in materials and technologies have allowed the fabrication of thin-film electronics on previously incompatible substrates. Transfer techniques using supportive carriers in the electronics stack have been developed to mitigate potential damages caused by conventional fabrication processes. A substrate-free approach for the transfer of ultra-thin electronics has been presented, enabling the development of ultra-thin devices on unconventional surfaces.
Innovation in materials and technologies has promoted the fabrication of thin-film electronics on substrates previously considered incompatible because of their chemical or mechanical properties. Indeed, conventional fabrication processes, typically based on photolithography, involve solvents and acids that might harm fragile or exotic substrates. In this context, transfer techniques define a route to overcome the issues related to the nature of the substrate by using supportive carriers in the electronics stack that mitigate or avoid any damages during the fabrication process. Here, a substrate-free approach is presented for the transfer of ultra-thin electronics (<150nm-thick) where no additional layer besides the electronics one remains on the final substrate. Devices are transferred on several surfaces showing good adhesion and an average performance variation of 27%. Furthermore, a sensor bent to a radius of 15.25 mu m, shows variation in performance of 5%. The technique can also be sequentially repeated for the fabrication of stacked electronics, enabling the development of ultra-thin devices, compliant on unconventional surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available