4.5 Article

The Behavior of Direct Reduced Iron in the Electric Arc Furnace Hotspot

Journal

METALS
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met13050978

Keywords

direct reduced iron; electric arc furnace; sponge iron; hydrogen DRI; slag formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogen-based direct reduction is a promising technology for CO2 lean steelmaking, with the electric arc furnace being the most relevant equipment for processing direct reduced iron (DRI). The behavior of DRI in the arc area is of great interest. Laboratory-scale experiments were conducted using a hydrogen plasma smelting reduction (HPSR) reactor under inert conditions. The results showed that carburized DRI is preferable, and the addition of slag-forming oxides in the arc has a mixing effect.
Hydrogen-based direct reduction is a promising technology for CO2 lean steelmaking. The electric arc furnace is the most relevant aggregate for processing direct reduced iron (DRI). As DRI is usually added into the arc, the behavior in this area is of great interest. A laboratory-scale hydrogen plasma smelting reduction (HPSR) reactor was used to analyze that under inert conditions. Four cases were compared: carbon-free and carbon-containing DRI from DR-grade pellets as well as fines from a fluidized bed reactor were melted batch-wise. A slag layer's influence was investigated using DRI from the BF-grade pellets and the continuous addition of slag-forming oxides. While carbon-free materials show a porous structure with gangue entrapments, the carburized DRI forms a dense regulus with the oxides collected on top. The test with slag-forming oxides demonstrates the mixing effect of the arc's electromagnetic forces. The cross-section shows a steel melt framed by a slag layer. These experiments match the past work in that carburized DRI is preferable, and material feed to the hotspot is critical for the EAF operation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available