4.5 Article

Rapid Fatigue Limit Estimation of Metallic Materials Using Thermography-Based Approach

Journal

METALS
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met13061147

Keywords

infrared thermography; high-cycle fatigue; fatigue limit; metallic materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to develop a theoretical model combined with RVE theory for rapid fatigue limit prediction. It is believed that anelastic and microplastic behaviors contribute to temperature variation in high-cycle fatigue, and a constitutive equation is deduced to relate temperature rise evolution to stress amplitude using the heat balance equation. A method combining statistical analysis with thermographic experimental data is also developed for accurate fatigue limit estimation. Experimental data of metallic specimens and welded joints validate the proposed model, showing good agreement between experimental and predicted data.
This work attempts to develop a theoretical model in combination with the representative volume element (RVE) theory for realizing rapid fatigue limit prediction. Within the thermodynamic framework, it is believed that two components, namely anelastic and microplastic behaviors, which correspond to recoverable and non-recoverable microstructural motions, contribute to temperature variation during high-cycle fatigue. Based on this, the constitutive equation of the response relationship between the temperature rise evolution and the stress amplitude of metallic materials can be deduced in combination with the heat balance equation. Meanwhile, a determination approach for the thermographic experimental data for accurate fatigue limit estimation is developed by combining it with a statistical method. Finally, the experimental data of metallic specimens and welded joints were utilized to validate the proposed model, and the results demonstrated great agreement between experimental and predicted data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available