4.1 Article

Evaluating process utilities for the treatment burden of chemotherapy in multiple myeloma in Japan: a time trade-off valuation study

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 565-573

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2197811

Keywords

Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma; time trade-off; health state utilities; triple-class exposed; CART cell therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used the time trade-off (TTO) method to estimate the process utilities of treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in Japan. The impact of treatment options on health state utilities, particularly in relation to process utilities, was found to be significant.
Aims: This study estimated the process utilities of treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in Japan using the time trade-off (TTO) method. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy is available for patients with RRMM who are triple-class exposed (TCE) after treatment with immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. However, the impact of available treatment options on health state utilities has not been well characterized, particularly in relation to process utilities. Methods: Eight vignettes of health states and daily activity restrictions related to each of the following RRMM therapies were prepared: no treatment, CAR T cell therapy with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), regular intravenous infusion, and oral administration. A face-to-face survey of healthy Japanese adults who were representative of the general population was conducted. The TTO method was used to evaluate each vignette and to generate utility scores for each treatment regimen. Results: Three hundred and nineteen respondents participated in the survey (mean age: 44 years [range: 20-64]; female: 50%). Utility scores for no treatment, ide-cel, oral pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (Pd) therapy ranged from similar to 0.7 to 0.8. Utility scores for regular intravenous infusion regimens ranged from 0.50 to 0.56. There was a difference of similar to 0.2 between the utility scores for no treatment/ide-cel/oral administration and regular intravenous infusions. Conclusions: Differences in treatment administration across RRMM therapies showed a substantial impact on health state utilities. When quantifying the value of treatments, process utility gains should be considered as an independent factor in health technology assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available