4.6 Article

Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals the Genetic Basis of Duck Plumage Colors

Journal

GENES
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes14040856

Keywords

duck plumage color; MC1R gene; MITF gene; genome-wide association study; epitasis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a genome-wide association study to identify candidate genes associated with white, black, and spotty plumage in domestic ducks. The results showed that two non-synonymous SNPs in MC1R were significantly related to black plumage, while three SNPs in MITF were associated with white plumage. The epistatic effect between MC1R and MITF genes was also observed. These findings highlight the importance of epistasis in plumage color variation in ducks.
Plumage color is an artificially and naturally selected trait in domestic ducks. Black, white, and spotty are the main feather colors in domestic ducks. Previous studies have shown that black plumage color is caused by MC1R, and white plumage color is caused by MITF. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify candidate genes associated with white, black, and spotty plumage in ducks. Two non-synonymous SNPs in MC1R (c.52G>A and c.376G>A) were significantly related to duck black plumage, and three SNPs in MITF (chr13:15411658A>G, chr13:15412570T>C and chr13:15412592C>G) were associated with white plumage. Additionally, we also identified the epistatic interactions between causing loci. Some ducks with white plumage carry the c.52G>A and c.376G>A in MC1R, which also compensated for black and spotty plumage color phenotypes, suggesting that MC1R and MITF have an epistatic effect. The MITF locus was supposed to be an upstream gene to MC1R underlying the white, black, and spotty colors. Although the specific mechanism remains to be further clarified, these findings support the importance of epistasis in plumage color variation in ducks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available