4.6 Article

A randomised sham-controlled study evaluating rTMS analgesic efficacy for postherpetic neuralgia

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1158737

Keywords

postherpetic neuralgia; TMS; motor cortex; DLPFC; sleep

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) by stimulating the motor cortex (M1) and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The results showed that M1 stimulation was superior to DLPFC stimulation in reducing pain and improving sleep quality in PHN patients.
Context: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a refractory neuropathic pain condition in which new treatment options are being developed. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may have the potential to reduce pain sensations in patients with postherpetic neuralgia. Objectives: This study investigated the efficacy on postherpetic neuralgia by stimulating two potential targets, the motor cortex (M1) and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Methods: This is a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled study. Potential participants were recruited from Hangzhou First People's Hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to either the M1, DLPFC or Sham group. Patients received ten daily sessions of 10-Hz rTMS in 2 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome measure was visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed at baseline, first week of treatment (week 1), post-treatment (week 2), 1-week (week 4), 1-month (week 6) and 3-month (week 14) follow-up. Results: Of sixty patients enrolled, 51 received treatment and completed all outcome assessments. M1 stimulation resulted in a larger analgesia during and after treatment compared to the Sham (week 2 - week 14, p <0.005), as well as to the DLPFC stimulation (week 1 - week 14, p < 0.05). In addition to pain, sleep disturbance was significantly improved and relieved by targeting either the M1 or the DLPFC (M1: week 4 - week 14, p < 0.01; DLPFC: week 4 - week 14, p <0.01). Moreover, pain sensations following M1 stimulation uniquely predicted improvement in sleep quality. Conclusion: M1 rTMS is superior to DLPFC stimulation in treating PHN with excellent pain response and long-term analgesia. Meanwhile, M1 and DLPFC stimulation were equally effective in improving sleep quality in PHN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available