4.6 Article

Visual expertise modulates resting-state brain network dynamics in radiologists: a degree centrality analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1152619

Keywords

degree centrality; visual expertise; object recognition; support vector machine; radiologist

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study recruited 22 radiology interns and 22 matched healthy controls to investigate how visual experience modulates resting-state brain network dynamics. The results showed significant differences in brain regions associated with visual processing, decision making, memory, attention control, and working memory between the radiology interns and control group. Using a machine learning algorithm, they achieved a classification accuracy of 88.64%. These findings provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of visual expertise.
Visual expertise reflects accumulated experience in reviewing domain-specific images and has been shown to modulate brain function in task-specific functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. However, little is known about how visual experience modulates resting-state brain network dynamics. To explore this, we recruited 22 radiology interns and 22 matched healthy controls and used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and the degree centrality (DC) method to investigate changes in brain network dynamics. Our results revealed significant differences in DC between the RI and control group in brain regions associated with visual processing, decision making, memory, attention control, and working memory. Using a recursive feature elimination-support vector machine algorithm, we achieved a classification accuracy of 88.64%. Our findings suggest that visual experience modulates resting-state brain network dynamics in radiologists and provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of visual expertise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available