4.6 Article

Loss of action-related function and connectivity in the blind extrastriate body area

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.973525

Keywords

congenital blindness; neuroimaging; body representation; resting-state fMRI; visuomotor interactions; extrastriate body area; plasticity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The perceptual function of the Extrastriate Body Area (EBA) develops independently of visual experience, while its action-related function depends on visual experience. Congenital blindness alters EBA's connectivity pattern, with decreased functional connectivity with sensorimotor cortices and maintained connectivity with perception-related visual occipital cortices.
The Extrastriate Body Area (EBA) participates in the visual perception and motor actions of body parts. We recently showed that EBA's perceptual function develops independently of visual experience, responding to stimuli with body-part information in a supramodal fashion. However, it is still unclear if the EBA similarly maintains its action-related function. Here, we used fMRI to study motor-evoked responses and connectivity patterns in the congenitally blind brain. We found that, unlike the case of perception, EBA does not develop an action-related response without visual experience. In addition, we show that congenital blindness alters EBA's connectivity profile in a counterintuitive way-functional connectivity with sensorimotor cortices dramatically decreases, whereas connectivity with perception-related visual occipital cortices remains high. To the best of our knowledge, we show for the first time that action-related functions and connectivity in the visual cortex could be contingent on visuomotor experience. We further discuss the role of the EBA within the context of visuomotor control and predictive coding theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available