4.6 Review

Dityrosine cross-linking and its potential roles in Alzheimer's disease

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1132670

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid-beta; tau; oxidative; dityrosine

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress contributes to aging and Alzheimer's disease by causing damage to proteins. The covalent links between adjacent tyrosines, known as dityrosine (DiY) cross-linking, can serve as a biomarker of accumulated oxidative stress. Studies have shown the presence of DiY crosslinks in both A beta and tau deposits, but there is no consensus on their impact on A beta and tau function, aggregation, and toxicity. This review summarizes the current understanding of the role of DiY on A beta and tau, and discusses its potential as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease.
Oxidative stress is a significant source of damage that accumulates during aging and contributes to Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. Oxidation of proteins can give rise to covalent links between adjacent tyrosines known as dityrosine (DiY) cross-linking, amongst other modifications, and this observation suggests that DiY could serve as a biomarker of accumulated oxidative stress over the lifespan. Many studies have focused on understanding the contribution of DiY to AD pathogenesis and have revealed that DiY crosslinks can be found in both A beta and tau deposits - the two key proteins involved in the formation of amyloid plaques and tau tangles, respectively. However, there is no consensus yet in the field on the impact of DiY on A beta and tau function, aggregation, and toxicity. Here we review the current understanding of the role of DiY on A beta and tau gathered over the last 20 years since the first observation, and discuss the effect of this modification for A beta and tau aggregation, and its potential as a biomarker for AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available