4.6 Review

Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of acupuncture at ST36: a coordinate-based meta-analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1180434

Keywords

ST36; functional magnetic resonance imaging; mechanism; acupuncture; systematic review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a meta-analysis of fMRI studies on acupuncture at ST36 revealed that it could activate the left cerebellum, bilateral Rolandic operculum, right supramarginal gyrus, and right cerebellum, indicating its association with action and perception.
BackgroundFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been widely used to investigate the brain effect of acupuncture point Stomach 36 (ST36, Zusanli). However, inconsistent results have hindered our understanding of the neural mechanisms of acupuncture at ST36. ObjectiveTo perform a meta-analysis of fMRI studies on acupuncture at ST36 to assess the brain atlas of acupuncture at ST36 from available studies. MethodBased on a preregistered protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42019119553), a large set of databases was searched up to August 9, 2021, without language restrictions. Peak coordinates were extracted from clusters that showed significant signal differences before and after acupuncture treatment. A meta-analysis was performed using seed-based d mapping with permutation of subject images (SDM-PSI), a newly improved meta-analytic method. ResultsA total of 27 studies (27 ST36) were included. This meta-analysis found that ST36 could activate the left cerebellum, the bilateral Rolandic operculum, the right supramarginal gyrus, and the right cerebellum. Functional characterizations showed that acupuncture at ST36 was mainly associated with action and perception. ConclusionOur results provide a brain atlas for acupuncture at ST36, which, besides offering a better understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms, also provides the possibility of future precision therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available