4.5 Article

SNAP: a structure-based neuron morphology reconstruction automatic pruning pipeline

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2023.1174049

Keywords

neuron morphology reconstruction; bioinformatics; image processing; post-processing; dendrite tracing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SNAP is a structure-based neuron morphology reconstruction pruning pipeline that improves the usability of reconstruction results by reducing erroneous extra reconstruction and splitting entangled neurons. Experimental results show that SNAP achieves pruning with high precision and recall, making it an effective tool for neuron morphology analysis.
Background: Neuron morphology analysis is an essential component of neuron cell-type definition. Morphology reconstruction represents a bottleneck in high-throughput morphology analysis workflow, and erroneous extra reconstruction owing to noise and entanglements in dense neuron regions restricts the usability of automated reconstruction results. We propose SNAP, a structure-based neuron morphology reconstruction pruning pipeline, to improve the usability of results by reducing erroneous extra reconstruction and splitting entangled neurons. Methods: For the four different types of erroneous extra segments in reconstruction (caused by noise in the background, entanglement with dendrites of close-by neurons, entanglement with axons of other neurons, and entanglement within the same neuron), SNAP incorporates specific statistical structure information into rules for erroneous extra segment detection and achieves pruning and multiple dendrite splitting. Results: Experimental results show that this pipeline accomplishes pruning with satisfactory precision and recall. It also demonstrates good multiple neuron-splitting performance. As an effective tool for post-processing reconstruction, SNAP can facilitate neuron morphology analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available