4.0 Article

Normative data for the 12-item Buschke memory task in the Quebec-French population aged 50 and over

Journal

APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2213368

Keywords

Aging; cognitive assessment; episodic memory; 12-item buschke; normative data

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to provide normative data for the 12-item Buschke memory test in the Quebec-French population aged 50 and older. Results showed that age, years of formal education, and sex were associated with performance on the test. Normative data were provided in the form of Z-scores equations and percentiles. These findings are important for improving clinicians' accuracy in detecting verbal episodic memory impairments in Quebec's aging population.
ObjectiveThe 12-item Buschke memory test is used to assess verbal episodic memory in adults and older adults. However, there is no normative data for this test adjusted to the older Quebec-French population. The aim of the study was to produce normative data for the 12-item Buschke for the Quebec-French population aged 50 and older.MethodThe normative sample consisted of 172 healthy French-speaking participants aged 50-89 years, from the Province of Quebec (Canada). The influence of age, years of formal education, and sex on five 12-item Buschke scores were analyzed. Based on the distribution of scores, normative data were developed as Z-scores equation, regression equation, and percentiles.ResultsAge, years of formal education, and sex were all associated with performance. Equations to calculate Z-scores were provided for the free recall trial 1 and the free recall trials 1-3. Stratified percentiles were provided for the delayed free recall and total recall 1-3.ConclusionsThe normative data for the 12-item Buschke improve the accuracy of clinicians to detect verbal episodic memory impairments in Quebec's aging population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available