4.5 Article

Flat Solenoidal Ice-Binding Proteins as Scaffolds for Solid-Binders

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202300001

Keywords

antifreeze proteins; silica-binding proteins; solid-binding proteins; beta-solenoid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid interfacing biomaterials are crucial for bionanotechnology and biosensing applications. Flat solenoidal proteins are suitable scaffolds for designing solid-binding proteins, and a variant called RiSiBP-6 has been developed through mutation and shown to bind strongly to silica surfaces. The fusion of sfGFP-RiSiBP-6 allows for the functional display of a monolayer of sfGFP cargo on silica surfaces, indicating the potential of flat solenoidal proteins as scaffolds for solid-binding protein design.
Solid interfacing biomaterials is a crucial aspect of bionanotechnology and important for applications such as biosensing. Because of their potentially large contact area, flat solenoidal proteins are ideal scaffolds for designing proteins binding to surfaces of man-made solids such as minerals, metals, and plastics. To explore this opportunity, a naturally occurring flat solenoidal protein: the Rhagium inquistor Antifreeze Protein from the insect Rhagium inquisitor is re-designed. By mutating 4, 6, and 10 out of its 4 x 5 arrays of threonines into arginines, it have arrived at the silica-binding proteins RiSiBP-4, RiSiBP-6, and RiSiBP-10. Variants with increasing numbers of arginines bind stronger to silica, but are also less stable and increasingly difficult to produce. It is found that the RiSiBP-6 variant binds strongly to silica yet still has good stability and easy production. It is shown that sfGFP-RiSiBP-6 fusions allow for the functional display of a monolayer of sfGFP cargo on silica surfaces, suggesting the general usefulness of flat solenoidal proteins as scaffolds for designing solid-binding proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available