4.3 Article

Collaborative optimization of rescue operation and timetable rescheduling under metro train failure

Journal

TRANSPORTMETRICA B-TRANSPORT DYNAMICS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21680566.2023.2203847

Keywords

Urban rail transit; train failures; rescue operations; timetable rescheduling; additional train

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a collaborative model to optimize train rescue operations and timetable rescheduling. The model includes various strategies such as retiming, train cancellation, skip-stopping, and inserting additional trains. The objective is to minimize the duration of train rescue and the number of stranded passengers. The results show that the proposed method reduces the number of stranded passengers by 28.6% at a slight increase in train rescue duration compared to the sequential method. Moreover, inserting additional trains and skip-stopping are found to be effective in improving service quality during disruptions.
Train failures may lead to disruptions of train operations and degradation of the service quality. This situation requires a quick turnaround to rescue the disabled train and reschedule the timetable. This paper proposes a collaborative model to optimise train rescue operations and timetable rescheduling, which includes retiming, cancelling trains, skip-stopping, and inserting additional trains. The model objective is to minimise train rescue duration and the number of stranded passengers. A tabu search algorithm combined with solver GUROBI is designed to solve the model. Case studies show that the proposed method reduces the number of stranded passengers by 28.6% at the cost of 5% increment of train rescue duration compared to the sequential method which finds the rescue operations first and then reschedules the train timetable. Moreover, the results indicate that inserting additional trains and skip-stopping are effective in improving service quality during disruptions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available