4.4 Article

A speed-based model for collaborative movement simulation of the elderly assisted by the young

Journal

TRANSPORTMETRICA A-TRANSPORT SCIENCE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23249935.2023.2182141

Keywords

Collision-free speed model; collaborative movement; elderly pedestrians; assisted group; bottleneck modelling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the increasing aging population, the efficiency of elderly people's traffic has gained attention. A collaborative movement model, based on collision-free speed model, has been developed for young people to assist the elderly. The model has been validated through controlled experiments and exhibits high reliability in both macroscopic characteristics and microscopic parameters. The model reproduces stable space and movement characteristics of the assisted group, and helps understand movement differences and coordination mechanisms of the assisted group.
With the development of the aging population, the traffic efficiency of the elderly deserves attention. A collaborative movement model for the young assisting the elderly is developed based on the collision-free speed model. In the corridor, the right-side pedestrian is set as the leader. At the exit, the proximity coefficient and comity coefficient are introduced to intuitively reflect the speed coordination and direction deviation of the young to the old. The model is validated according to the rules and parameters in the controlled experiment. The model shows high reliability in both macroscopic characteristics and microscopic parameters. It is found that the model can well reproduce the stable space and movement characteristics of the assisted group. Further, we apply the collaborative movement model to explore the interaction between individuals and the assisted groups. The model can help understand the movement differences and coordination mechanisms of the assisted group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available