4.5 Article

A Study on the Intersection of Ground Reaction Forces during Overground Walking in Down Syndrome: Effects of the Pathology and Left-Right Asymmetry

Journal

SYMMETRY-BASEL
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym15020544

Keywords

virtual pivot point; genetic disorder; gait analysis; clinical biomechanics; rehabilitation; Down Syndrome; postural stability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the dynamic gait function of individuals with Down Syndrome to healthy controls using the concept of the virtual pivot point (VPP). The results showed that individuals with Down Syndrome had an anteriorly located VPP compared to healthy controls, likely due to larger hip moments during the propulsive phase of stance. High R-2 values in individuals with Down Syndrome suggest a strong association between the VPP and dynamic stability during walking.
Motor dysfunctions in patients with Down Syndrome (DS) result in poor locomotion and an altered gait phenotype, characterized by compromised stability management and frequent bilateral asymmetries. Directing ground reaction forces to a point above the center of mass, referred to as the virtual pivot point (VPP), is one means of maintaining stability during walking. This cross-sectional observational study compared the dynamic gait function of 33 individuals with DS (mean age: 17.7 +/- 6.4 years, 13 females) to a group of 36 healthy controls (mean age: 15.5 +/- 6.1 years, 15 females), using the concept of the VPP. Results showed that the VPP was located more anteriorly in individuals with DS compared to healthy controls, with no differences in the variability (R-2) or symmetry of VPP coordinates. This anterior VPP position is likely due to the larger hip moments observed in patients with DS during the propulsive phase of stance. High R-2 values in DS suggest that the VPP is strongly related to dynamic stability during walking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available