4.6 Article

Deep Churn Prediction Method for Telecommunication Industry

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15054543

Keywords

telecommunication industry; churn prediction; data analytics; customer relationship management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predicting churn rate is crucial for the success and profitability of the telecommunication industry. This study compares different learning strategies to build a churn prediction model, aiming to accurately predict customer churn without compromising profit. The evaluation results show that CNN and ANN techniques perform better than other methods, achieving high accuracy rates on both datasets.
Being able to predict the churn rate is the key to success for the telecommunication industry. It is also important for the telecommunication industry to obtain a high profit. Thus, the challenge is to predict the churn percentage of customers with higher accuracy without comprising the profit. In this study, various types of learning strategies are investigated to address this challenge and build a churn predication model. Ensemble learning techniques (Adaboost, random forest (RF), extreme randomized tree (ERT), xgboost (XGB), gradient boosting (GBM), and bagging and stacking), traditional classification techniques (logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), and k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and artificial neural network (ANN)), and the deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) technique have been tested to select the best model for building a customer churn prediction model. The evaluation of the proposed models was conducted using two pubic datasets: Southeast Asian telecom industry, and American telecom market. On both of the datasets, CNN and ANN returned better results than the other techniques. The accuracy obtained on the first dataset using CNN was 99% and using ANN was 98%, and on the second dataset it was 98% and 99%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available