4.6 Article

Electrical Efficiency Investigation on Photovoltaic Thermal Collector with Two Different Coolants

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15076136

Keywords

photovoltaic thermal collector; nanofluid; electrical; electrical thermal efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the design and development of a photovoltaic thermal (PVT) collector and evaluates its electrical and electrical thermal efficiency. Two types of coolants, liquid and liquid-based MnO nanofluid, were used to enhance the system performance. Parametric investigations were conducted on clear and sunny days, examining electrical power generation, glazing surface temperature, electrical efficiency, and electrical thermal efficiency. The findings suggest that the MnO water nanofluid outperforms water nanofluid and stand-alone PV systems in photovoltaic energy conversion. The study covers three different domains: stand-alone PV, liquid-based PVT collector, and liquid-based MnO nanofluids.
The design and development of a photovoltaic thermal (PVT) collector were developed in this study, and electrical and electrical thermal efficiency were assessed. To improve system performance, two types of coolants were employed, liquid and liquid-based MnO nanofluid. Flow rates ranging from 1 to 4 liters per minute (LPM) for the interval of 1.0 LPM were employed, together with a 0.1% concentration of manganese oxide (MnO) nanofluid. Various parametric investigations, including electrical power generation, glazing surface temperature, electrical efficiency, and electrical thermal efficiency, were carried out on testing days, which were clear and sunny. Outdoor studies for the aforementioned nanofluids and liquids were carried out at volume flow rates ranging from 1 to 4 LPM, which can be compared for reference to a freestanding PV system. The research of two efficiency levels, electrical and electrical thermal, revealed that MnO water nanofluid provides better photovoltaic energy conversion than water nanofluid and stand-alone PV systems. In this study, three different domains were examined: stand-alone PV, liquid-based PVT collector, and liquid-based MnO nanofluids. The stand-alone PV system achieved a lower performance, the liquid-based MnO performed better, and the liquid-based PVT achieved an intermediate level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available