4.6 Article

Control of Oxygen Excess Ratio for a PEMFC Air Supply System by Intelligent PID Methods

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15118500

Keywords

oxygen excess ratio; PID; fuzzy logic inference; neural network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a nonlinear air supply system model integrated with the fuel cell stack voltage model is built. Conventional PID controls for the oxygen excess ratio are implemented, and fuzzy logic inference and neural network algorithm are integrated into the PID controller to tune the gain coefficients. Simulation results show that the fuzzy PID controller with seven subsets can improve the dynamic responses of the fuel cells in both constant and variable OER controls.
The hydrogen fuel cell is a quite promising green device, which could be applied in extensive fields. However, as a complex nonlinear system involving a number of subsystems, the fuel cell system requires multiple variables to be effectively controlled. Oxygen excess ratio (OER) is the key indicator to be controlled to avoid oxygen starvation, which may result in severe performance degradation and life shortage of the fuel cell stack. In this paper, a nonlinear air supply system model integrated with the fuel cell stack voltage model is first built, based on physical laws and empirical data; then, conventional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controls for the oxygen excess ratio are implemented. On this basis, fuzzy logic inference and neural network algorithm are integrated into the conventional PID controller to tune the gain coefficients, respectively. The simulation results verify that the fuzzy PID controller with seven subsets could clearly improve the dynamic responses of the fuel cells in both constant and variable OER controls, with small overshoots and the fastest settling times of less than 0.2 s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available