4.6 Article

Lab-Tec@Home: Technological Innovation in Control Engineering Education with Impact on Complex Thinking Competency

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15097598

Keywords

professional education; educational innovation; future of education; complex thinking; control engineering; higher education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents the results of implementing the Lab-Tec@Home kit, an educational innovation that allows students to set up home laboratories for testing control engineering concepts. It measures the acquisition and development of students' perceived achievement of complex thinking competency during this educational practice. The results show an impact on the homogeneity of students' perceived skills, highlighting the value of this educational tool.
The objective of this paper is to present the results of the implementation process of the Lab-Tec@Home kit, an educational innovation that allows students to set up home laboratories to test and validate basic control engineering concepts. Specifically, the purpose of this study is to measure the acquisition and development of students' perceived achievement of complex thinking competency during this educational practice, considering how valuable it is to improve their perception of additional skills while fulfilling the objectives of the innovation. We implemented a validated instrument to measure this competency before and after using the Lab-Tec@Home kit and in a control group where this educational innovation practice was not carried out. Although the results did not show a statistically significant difference in the level of perception or the improvement achieved between the groups, they indicated an impact on the homogeneity of the students' perceived skills, which is a value of this educational tool and its greatest finding and contribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available