4.6 Article

Urban Scale Monitoring Approach for the Assessment of Rising Damp Effects in Venice

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15076274

Keywords

rising damp effects; monitoring methodology; Venice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rising damp of salty water in coastal areas is a well-known degradation factor for historical masonries, especially in Venice. The increase in flooding events and direct contact with salty water exacerbate this decay. This paper proposes a non-invasive and economically sustainable approach to evaluate the effects of rising damp at an urban scale.
In coastal areas, the rising damp of salty water is a well-known degradation factor of historical masonries, leading to visible features such as crusts, masonry erosion, and plaster loss. Venetian masonries are strongly affected by decay caused by rising damp exacerbated by direct contact with salty water. Recurrent flooding due to high tides and an increase in the frequency of flooding events, also related to climate change, raises concern about the impacts. Although several studies have been carried out on probable future scenarios, a valuation of the decay risk due to rising damp at the urban level still needs to be implemented. This paper proposes a non-invasive and economically sustainable approach for evaluating rising damp effects at an urban scale. The approach includes a collection of archive images of masonries affected by rising damp dating back to the 1990s; a visual survey of the actual conservation state of masonries; a classification based on significant descriptors; and a discussion on exposure conditions and conservation states. The descriptors chosen are rising damp levels, biological growth, plaster loss, efflorescence, and brick erosion. The evaluation was implemented in a georeferenced system suitable for future comparisons, thus providing a management tool for the city's preservation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available