4.6 Article

Exploitation or Exploration? Managerial Myopia, Economic Policy Uncertainty and Ambidextrous Innovation Investment

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Managerial Myopia and Long-Term Investment: Evidence from China

Qilong Cao et al.

Summary: This study combines the upper echelons theory and agency theory to argue that myopic managerial behavior is harmful to a firm's long-term investment. An indicator assessing managerial myopia is constructed using textual analysis. The moderating effect analysis suggests that the negative impact of managerial myopia on long-term investments is mitigated by institutional investor ownership and analyst coverage. Furthermore, managerial myopia negatively correlates with capital expenditures and R&D investments. The cross-sectional analysis indicates that the correlation between managerial myopia and long-term investment is stronger in highly competitive industries, poor performing firms, and non-state-owned enterprises.

SUSTAINABILITY (2023)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Impact of Self-Efficacy on Entrepreneurs' Ambidextrous Behavior in New Ventures: Moderating Effect of Status

Jun Ma et al.

Summary: This article explores the ambidextrous behavior of entrepreneurs in new ventures, specifically discussing the influence of entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) and the role of status as a moderator. The findings suggest an inverted 'U' relationship between ESE and ambidextrous behavior. Additionally, the analysis reveals that higher economic status strengthens the relationship between ESE and ambidextrous behavior, while higher power status weakens the relationship. These findings are supported by the context of high-tech industry entrepreneurs in emerging economies, such as China.

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES (2023)

Article Business

Selecting Innovation Projects: Do Middle and Senior Managers Differ When It Comes to Radical Innovation?

Ralf Wilden et al.

Summary: This article theorizes about the differences in middle and senior managers' choices to pursue innovation projects, and finds that middle managers place more value on innovation characteristics required to complete the project, while senior managers are more concerned with external knowledge resources that benefit radical innovation.

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES (2023)

Article Business

TOO MUCH ON THE PLATE? HOW EXECUTIVE JOB DEMANDS HARM FIRM INNOVATION AND REDUCE SHARE OF EXPLORATORY INNOVATIONS

David H. Zhu et al.

Summary: This study builds on psychological research and executive job demands theory to explore the impact of executive job demands on a firm's innovation. It finds that executive job demands can influence the balance of innovative activities and weaken the negative effects through factors such as diversity and innovative climate. The survey data supports some hypotheses, but does not support the moderating effects of innovative climate. This study provides a new perspective for innovation scholars and advances the development of executive job demands theory.

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL (2022)

Article Economics

Managerial myopia and short-termism of innovation strategy: Financialisation of Korean firms

Hwan Joo Seo et al.

CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS (2020)

Article Management

Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing function ambidexterity

Francois Constant et al.

JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT (2020)

Article Business

The role of endogenous and exogenous risk in FDI entry choices

Peter J. Buckley et al.

JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS (2020)

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Board Human Capital and Enterprise Growth: A Perspective of Ambidextrous Innovation

Zhui Liu et al.

SUSTAINABILITY (2019)

Article Business, Finance

Decoupling management inefficiency: Myopia, hyperopia and takeover likelihood

Abongeh A. Tunyi et al.

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (2019)

Article Management

Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation

Oksana Koryak et al.

RESEARCH POLICY (2018)

Article Business, Finance

Equity Vesting and Investment

Alex Edmans et al.

REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES (2017)

Article Economics

Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty

Scott R. Baker et al.

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS (2016)

Article Business, Finance

Speaking of the short-term: disclosure horizon and managerial myopia

Francois Brochet et al.

REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES (2015)

Article Business

ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE

Charles A. O'Reilly et al.

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES (2013)

Article Business, Finance

The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation

Jie (Jack) He et al.

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (2013)

Article Business

The Theory and Practice of Myopic Management

Natalie Mizik

JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH (2010)

Article Psychology, Social

The Social Language of Time: The Time Perspective-Social Network Connection

E. Alison Holman et al.

BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2009)

Article Business

The time frames of entrepreneurs

Allen C. Bluedorn et al.

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING (2008)

Review Business

Exploring the debate on short-termism: A theoretical and empirical analysis

David Marginson et al.

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL (2008)

Review Business, Finance

The economic implications of corporate financial reporting

JR Graham et al.

JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS (2005)

Review Business

Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited

MJ Benner et al.

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW (2003)

Article Business, Finance

Agency costs and ownership structure

JS Ang et al.

JOURNAL OF FINANCE (2000)

Article Management

When Does a CEO's Risk Propensity Drive Exploration in Product Development?

Dovev Lavie et al.

Summary: This study investigates the effect of a CEO's risk propensity on a firm's tendency to explore in product development under personal, organizational, and environmental conditions. It finds that a CEO's ability to drive exploration increases with the CEO's power in the firm, but the firm's accumulated exploration experience actually weakens the CEO's impact. The study highlights the importance of balance between exploration and exploitation, as well as competitive pressure in influencing a CEO's risk propensity.

STRATEGY SCIENCE