4.6 Article

Small Hydroelectric Energy and Spatial Planning: A Methodology Introducing the Concept of Territorial Carrying Capacity

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su15065165

Keywords

small hydroelectric power stations; spatial planning; territorial carrying capacity; watercourse; catchment; Special Spatial Planning Framework; Greece

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The promotion of RESs is a crucial policy to enhance clean energy production, reduce reliance on fossil fuels, and address climate change commitments. Spatial planning plays a vital role in directing investments in RESs while considering the coexistence of RESs with environmental assets. This paper proposes a new territorial carrying capacity approach to supplement the existing watercourse-based approach, aiming to place carrying capacity in a broader and more strategic spatial planning context.
The promotion of renewable energy sources (RESs) is a key European and national policy aimed at strengthening clean energy production, decoupling from fossil fuels, and responding to climate change commitments. Spatial planning is crucial as it can spatially direct the demand for investments in RESs, taking into account the challenges related to more efficient coexistence of RESs and environmental assets, both natural and manmade. Specific objectives, such as the definition of the carrying capacity concept, take on considerable importance in ensuring the balance between the demand for RESs and a number of other priorities. Small hydroelectric power stations (SHPSs), being spatially dependent on the existence of the natural resource (water), incorporate specific impacts in the areas of installation; namely, the watercourses. Taking into consideration the concept of carrying capacity for the areas where SHPSs are proposed to be installed by the Greek Special Spatial Planning Framework for RESs, which is limited to a linear/watercourse approach, this paper proposes a new complementary approach, that of territorial carrying capacity. The former involves the negotiation of terms and conditions for siting an SHPS within the narrow range of a water body (watercourse), while the latter, as proposed in this paper, attempts to capture the problem at the level of the wider territory or the functional area of a catchment, an approach that places carrying capacity in a more strategic spatial planning context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available