4.6 Review

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Aging: A Review by the VascAgeNet COST Action

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027414

Keywords

aging; aorta; arterial stiffness; arteries; calcification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography accurately assess arterial state and function, but the complexity and technical requirements of some biomarkers hinder their widespread use. This review summarizes current biomarkers related to aortic aging, their principles, required sequences and postprocessing, and their predictive values for cardiovascular events.
Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography allow the characterization of arterial state and function with high confidence and thus play a key role in the understanding of arterial aging and its translation into the clinic. Decades of research into the development of innovative imaging sequences and image analysis techniques have led to the identification of a large number of potential biomarkers, some bringing improvement in basic science, others in clinical practice. Nonetheless, the complexity of some of these biomarkers and the image analysis techniques required for their computation hamper their widespread use. In this narrative review, current biomarkers related to aging of the aorta, their founding principles, the sequence, and postprocessing required, and their predictive values for cardiovascular events are summarized. For each biomarker a summary of reference values and reproducibility studies and limitations is provided. The present review, developed in the COST Action VascAgeNet, aims to guide clinicians and technical researchers in the critical understanding of the possibilities offered by these advanced imaging modalities for studying the state and function of the aorta, and their possible clinically relevant relationships with aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available