Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Human Mental Workload: A Survey and a Novel Inclusive Definition
Luca Longo et al.
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2022)
The Level of Measurement of Subjective Situation Awareness and Its Dimensions in the Situation Awareness Rating Technique (SART)
Matthew L. Bolton et al.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS (2022)
Investigating the validity of subjective workload rating (NASA TLX) and subjective situation awareness rating (SART) for cognitively complex human-machine work
Per Oivind Braarud
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS (2021)
The level of measurement of trust in automation
Jiajun Wei et al.
THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE (2021)
OpenMATB: A Multi-Attribute Task Battery promoting task customization, software extensibility and experiment replicability
J. Cegarra et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2020)
What do subjective workload scales really measure? Operational and representational solutions to divergence of workload measures
Gerald Matthews et al.
THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE (2020)
Measuring mental workload with the NASA-TLX needs to examine each dimension rather than relying on the global score: an example with driving
Edith Galy et al.
ERGONOMICS (2018)
Workload perception in drone flight training simulators
Gabriel G. De la Torre et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2016)
From figments to figures: ontological alchemy in human factors research
Sidney W. A. Dekker et al.
COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK (2015)
Measurement Theory, Psychology and the Revolution That Cannot Happen
Guenter Trendler
THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY (2009)
Evaluation of subjective mental workload: A comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and workload profile methods
S Rubio et al.
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE (2004)
Subjective rating scales: science or art?
J Annett
ERGONOMICS (2002)
Simplified subjective workload assessment technique
A Luximon et al.
ERGONOMICS (2001)