4.7 Article

Effects of sprayer speed, spray distance, and nozzle arrangement angle on low-flow air-assisted spray deposition

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1184244

Keywords

air-assisted; sprayer speed; spray distance; nozzle arrangement angle; deposit coverage; spray penetration; deposit distribution

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Air-assisted spraying technology is used in orchard sprayers to increase spray penetration and reduce droplet drift by disturbing canopy leaves and forcing droplets into the plant. In this study, a low-flow air-assisted sprayer with a self-designed nozzle was developed, and its effectiveness was tested in a vineyard. The optimal working conditions for the sprayer were determined, and the deposit coverage, spray penetration, and deposit distribution were evaluated.
Air-assisted spraying technology is widely used in orchard sprayers to disturb canopy leaves and force droplets into the plant canopy to reduce droplet drift and increase spray penetration. A low-flow air-assisted sprayer was developed based on a self-designed air-assisted nozzle. The effects of the sprayer speed, spray distance, and nozzle arrangement angle on the deposit coverage, spray penetration, and deposit distribution were investigated in a vineyard by means of orthogonal tests. The optimal working conditions for the low-flow air-assisted sprayer working in the vineyard were determined as a sprayer speed of 0.65m/s, a spray distance of 0.9m, and a nozzle arrangement angle of 20 degrees. The deposit coverages of the proximal canopy and intermediate canopy were 23.67% and 14.52%, respectively. The spray penetration was 0.3574. The variation coefficients of the deposit coverage of the proximal canopy and intermediate canopy, which indicate the uniformity of the deposition distribution, were 8.56% and 12.33%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available