4.5 Article

The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification

Journal

BIODATA MINING
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13040-023-00322-4

Keywords

Matthews correlation coefficient; Receiver operating characteristic curve; ROC; Area under the curve; AUC; ROC AUC; Confusion matrix; Binary classification; Supervised machine learning; Data mining; Data science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Binary classification commonly utilizes machine learning and computational statistics, with ROC AUC serving as the standard metric. However, ROC AUC has flaws and limitations. The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace ROC AUC as the standard statistic for binary classification in all scientific studies.
Binary classification is a common task for which machine learning and computational statistics are used, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) has become the common standard metric to evaluate binary classifications in most scientific fields. The ROC curve has true positive rate (also called sensitivity or recall) on the y axis and false positive rate on the x axis, and the ROC AUC can range from 0 (worst result) to 1 (perfect result). The ROC AUC, however, has several flaws and drawbacks. This score is generated including predictions that obtained insufficient sensitivity and specificity, and moreover it does not say anything about positive predictive value (also known as precision) nor negative predictive value (NPV) obtained by the classifier, therefore potentially generating inflated overoptimistic results. Since it is common to include ROC AUC alone without precision and negative predictive value, a researcher might erroneously conclude that their classification was successful. Furthermore, a given point in the ROC space does not identify a single confusion matrix nor a group of matrices sharing the same MCC value. Indeed, a given (sensitivity, specificity) pair can cover a broad MCC range, which casts doubts on the reliability of ROC AUC as a performance measure. In contrast, the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) generates a high score in its [-1; +1] interval only if the classifier scored a high value for all the four basic rates of the confusion matrix: sensitivity, specificity, precision, and negative predictive value. A high MCC (for example, MCC = 0.9), moreover, always corresponds to a high ROC AUC, and not vice versa. In this short study, we explain why the Matthews correlation coefficient should replace the ROC AUC as standard statistic in all the scientific studies involving a binary classification, in all scientific fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available