4.5 Article

System Predictability Assessed by Low Wavenumber Fourier Components and Analogue Pair Progression of Geopotential Height

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos14050886

Keywords

Rex block; Fourier decomposition; analogue pair; system predictability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study estimated the predictability limits for the Rex block by using 38 years of reanalysis data and associated 90-day winters. The unique aspect of this research lies in determining the predictability limits as a function of geopotential wave structure found through Fourier decomposition.
Following Lorenz's work using analogue pairs for establishing 10-to-14-day predictability limits for synoptic weather regimes, predictability limits for the Rex block, the long-wave wintertime ridge over the eastern Pacific Ocean and the western United States, have been estimated. This was accomplished by using mid-latitude geopotential height reanalysis data over a period of 38 years, 1979-2016, and associated 90-day winters (DJF). The metric used to define analogue pairs is the RMS difference assessed for the hemispheric 850, 500, and 200 hPa geopotential height fields. The resultant set of analogue pairs was used to estimate predictability with respect to both a single latitude circle (40 degrees N) that passes through the Rex Block and for a multi-latitude swath (20-80 degrees N). Our methods showed a range of results, by choice of Fourier component wavenumbers 2 through 8. These results indicate system predictability for low wavenumber components to exceed the 10-14-day limit imposed by Lorenz' results. The results to 21 days, the maximum predictability limit value allowed by our method, do not preclude the possibility of a greater range of system predictability past 21 days. The unique aspect of this work is determination of predictability limits as a function of geopotential wave structure found through Fourier decomposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available