4.5 Article

Enhancing GNSS-R Soil Moisture Accuracy with Vegetation and Roughness Correction

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos14030509

Keywords

spaceborne GNSS-R; effective reflectivity; soil moisture; vegetation attenuation; roughness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spaceborne Global Navigation Satellite System-Reflectometry (GNSS-R) has been proved to be an effective tool for monitoring Earth's surface soil moisture (SSM). However, the accuracy of GNSS-R SSM estimation is affected by surface vegetation and roughness. In this study, the sensitivity of delay Doppler map (DDM)-derived effective reflectivity to SSM is analyzed and validated. The results demonstrate that the accuracy of SSM retrieved by GNSS-R is improved with correcting vegetation over different types of vegetation-covered areas.
Spaceborne Global Navigation Satellite System-Reflectometry (GNSS-R) has been proven to be a cost-effective and efficient tool for monitoring the Earth's surface soil moisture (SSM) with unparalleled spatial and temporal resolution. However, the accuracy and reliability of GNSS-R SSM estimation are affected by surface vegetation and roughness. In this study, the sensitivity of delay Doppler map (DDM)-derived effective reflectivity to SSM is analyzed and validated. The individual effective reflectivity is projected onto the 36 km x 36 km Equal-Area Scalable Earth-Grid 2.0 (EASE-Grid2) to form the observation image, which is used to construct a global GNSS-R SSM retrieval model with the SMAP SSM serving as the reference value. In order to improve the accuracy of retrieved SSM from CYGNSS, the effective reflectivity is corrected using vegetation opacity and roughness coefficient parameters from SMAP products. Additionally, the impacts of vegetation and roughness on the estimated SSM were comprehensively evaluated. The results demonstrate that the accuracy of SSM retrieved by GNSS-R is improved with correcting vegetation over different types of vegetation-covered areas. The retrieval algorithm achieves an accuracy of 0.046 cm(3)cm(-3), resulting in a mean improvement of 4.4%. Validation of the retrieval algorithm through in situ measurements confirms its stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available