4.6 Article

Steric Effects in Ruddlesden-Popper Blue Perovskites for High Quantum Efficiency

Journal

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.202201824

Keywords

blue-emitting perovskites; lattice distortion; spacer engineering; steric effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient blue-emitting materials with single-halide RPPs using organic spacer engineering are reported in this study. The (110)-oriented thin films exhibit larger bandgap and enhanced stability, regardless of the choice of spacers, compared to other structures. This new class of RPPs exhibits sky-blue emission at 483 nm with a quantum efficiency of approximately 62%. The established protocol and strategy can be utilized to develop blue perovskite LEDs.
Ruddlesden-Popper perovskites (RPPs) feature enhanced stability compared to their bulk counterparts and attract attention for potential applications in light-emitting diodes (LEDs). However, to date, blue-emitting RPPs rely on halide compositional tuning, resulting in spectral shifts due to halide segregation under photo-/electrical-excitation. Here, efficient blue-emitting materials with single-halide RPPs using organic spacer engineering are reported. Experimental and computational results show that the (110)-oriented thin films exhibit larger bandgap and enhanced stability regardless of the choice of spacers, relative to the (100)-oriented RPPs. The correlation between the lattice structures and optoelectronic properties reveals that this new class of RPPs exhibits sky-blue emission at 483 nm with a quantum efficiency of approximate to 62%. Spearman correlation between the steric size of the spacers and the bandgap is estimated to be 92%, showing that the steric effect is crucial influencers. The protocol and strategy established in this study can be exploited to develop blue perovskite LEDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available