4.6 Article

Response Surface Optimization and Floc Structure Analysis of Magnetic Flocculation Technology for Anaerobic Digestion Reject Water

Journal

WATER
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w15040707

Keywords

magnetic flocculation technology; anaerobic digestion reject water; response surface optimization; floc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to improve the removal efficiencies of SS and Fe3+ in anaerobic digestion reject water, the response surface method was used to analyze the structure of the formed floc by magnetic flocculation. The optimum amounts of magnetic powder, polyaluminum chloride (PAC) and polyacrylamide (PAM) were determined for maximum removal efficiencies of 97.84% and 98.35% for SS and Fe3+ respectively. The floc treated by magnetic flocculation showed improved flocculation ability, with larger particle size, a rough and porous surface, and enhanced sedimentation performance compared to conventional coagulation.
In order to improve the removal efficiencies of SS and Fe3+ in anaerobic digestion reject water for the subsequent biological treatment process, on the basis of the single factor test in the early stage, the response surface method was used, and the structure of the formed floc was analyzed by magnetic flocculation. The optimum amounts of magnetic powder, polyaluminum chloride (PAC) and polyacrylamide (PAM) were 40.51 mg/L, 31.31 mg/L and 4.05 mg/L, respectively. At this time, the removal efficiencies of SS and Fe3+ were 97.84% and 98.35%. The effects of floc particle size, scanning electron microscopy, infrared spectroscopy and two-dimensional fractal dimension of flocs on the flocculation ability showed that: compared with conventional coagulation, the average particle size of flocs treated by magnetic flocculation was 76.56 mu m, the Fe-O-Al absorption peak appeared at 984 cm(-1), the flocculation ability was significantly improved, the surface of the floc was rough and porous, and the structure was dense, and the sedimentation performance was significantly improved also.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available