4.6 Article

Influence of Long-Term Wind Variability on the Storm Activity in the Caspian Sea

Journal

WATER
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w15112125

Keywords

wind waves; wave modeling; number of storms; trend; WAVEWATCH III; Caspian Sea; wind variability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on the impact of wind variability on storm activity in the Caspian Sea over the past 42 years. Using wave model WAVEWATCH III and the Peak Over Threshold method, the analysis shows positive trends in the number and duration of storms in the whole sea, particularly in the North and Middle Caspian regions. The number of storms in the Middle Caspian is influenced by positive trends in extreme wind situations.
Wind and wave conditions are limiting factors for economic activity, and it is very important to study the long-term variability of storm activity. The main motivation of this research is to assess the impact of wind variability on the storm activity in the Caspian Sea over the past 42 years. The paper presents the analysis of a number of storms based on the results of wave model WAVEWATCH III and the Peak Over Threshold method. The mean, maximum, and 95th percentile significant wave heights were analyzed by season. The highest waves were in the Middle Caspian Sea in winter. Detailed interannual and seasonal analyses of the number and duration of storm waves were performed for the whole Caspian Sea and its separate regions. Positive significant trends were found in the whole sea. Significant positive trends in the number and duration of storms were found for the North and Middle Caspian. In the South Caspian, the trends were negative and not significant. High correlations were found between the number of storms and events with wind speed > 10-14 m/s and 95th percentile wind speed. Positive trends in the number of storms in the Middle Caspian were caused by positive trends in extreme wind situations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available