4.6 Article

Simulating the Flood Limits of Urban Rivers Embedded in the Populated City of Santa Clara, Cuba

Journal

WATER
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w15101805

Keywords

hydraulic simulation; river flood; HEC-RAS model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research developed a hydraulic simulation model for urban rivers in Santa Clara, Cuba. The results showed a high risk of flooding near the control section 2 + 87. The flood limit map could be an important tool for risk assessment, evacuation planning, and flood mitigation strategies.
Floods are a natural phenomenon that cause damage to structures and property as well as negatively affect human life. Assessing the extent, speed, power, and depth of flooding has always been a challenge for water resource planners. This research developed a hydraulic simulation model for the Cubanicay and Belico urban rivers embedded in the city of Santa Clara, Cuba. The methodology was based on a one-dimensional model of the Hydrological Engineering River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) and GIS-based methods. The HEC-RAS model (Beta) and three modeling flood tests for scenarios of 1% (100 years), 2% (50 years), and 10% (10 years) of probability for hydrometeorological events were analyzed. Bank lines, flow path lines, and cross-section cut lines were extracted from Digital Elevation Models. Manning's roughness coefficients were considered for the channel morphology and soil typology. The flood Beta model results were accurate with a difference of +/- 0.10 m considering the water footprint found in the field. The results showed that the areas near the control section 2 + 87 presented a high risk of flooding. The flood limit map for urban areas could be an important tool for researchers, planners, and local governments for risk assessment and to develop evacuation plans and flood mitigation strategies in order to reduce human and economic losses during a flood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available