4.6 Article

Delineation of Groundwater Potential Area using an AHP, Remote Sensing, and GIS Techniques in the Ifni Basin, Western Anti-Atlas, Morocco

Journal

WATER
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w15071436

Keywords

analytical hierarchy process (AHP); GIS; groundwater potential area; Ifni basin; Morocco

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An assessment of potential groundwater areas in the Ifni basin was conducted using a multicriteria analytical approach that integrated geomorphological and hydroclimatic factors. Geographic information systems (GIS) and hierarchical analytical process (AHP) models were employed. The results provided a groundwater potential map (GWPA) and showed good predictive accuracy, enabling water operators to select favorable sites for groundwater extraction.
An assessment of potential groundwater areas in the Ifni basin, located in the western Anti-Atlas range of Morocco, was conducted based on a multicriteria analytical approach that integrated a set of geomorphological and hydroclimatic factors influencing the availability of this resource. This approach involved the use of geographic information systems (GIS) and hierarchical analytical process (AHP) models. Different factors were classified and weighted according to their contribution to and impact on groundwater reserves. Their normalized weights were evaluated using a pairwise comparison matrix. Four classes of potentiality emerged: very high, high, moderate, and low, occupying 15.22%, 20.17%, 30.96%, and 33.65%, respectively, of the basin's area. A groundwater potential map (GWPA) was validated by comparison with data from 134 existing water points using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The AUC was calculated at 80%, indicating the good predictive accuracy of the AHP method. These results will enable water operators to select favorable sites with a high groundwater potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available