4.3 Article

An evolutionary paradox on threadsnakes: Phenotypic and molecular evidence reveal a new and remarkably polymorphic species of Siagonodon (Serpentes: Leptotyphlopidae: Epictinae) from Amazonia

Journal

VERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 345-366

Publisher

STAATLICHES MUSEUM TIERKUNDE DRESDEN
DOI: 10.3897/vz.73.e98170

Keywords

Hemipenial morphology; intraspecific variation; Neotropics; osteology; phylogeny; polymorphism; Squamata

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes a new species and reassigns a known species, which is significant for the taxonomic and evolutionary research of threadsnakes. It also emphasizes the importance of protected areas in maintaining vertebrate populations.
Threadsnakes are known for their conserved external morphology and historically controversial systematics, challenging taxo-nomic, biogeographic and evolutionary researches in these fields. Recent morphological studies-mostly based on & mu;CT data of the skull and lower jaw-have resolved systematic issues within the group, for instance leading to the description of new taxa or re-positioning little-known scolecophidian taxa in the tree of life. Herein we describe a new polymorphic species of the genus Siagonodon from Amazonia based on morphological (external, osteology and hemipenis) and molecular data, and provide the first hemipenial description for the genus. We also reassign Siagonodon acutirostris to the genus Trilepida based on osteological data in combination with molecular evidence. The new species described represents an evolutionary paradox for scolecophidians because the species displays a remarkable variation in the shape of the snout region that is otherwise always highly conserved in this clade. Finally, this study reinforces the importance of protected areas as essential in maintaining vertebrate populations, including those that are not yet formally described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available