4.7 Article

Mutual Information Boosted Precipitation Nowcasting from Radar Images

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs15061639

Keywords

precipitation nowcasting; mutual information; data imbalance; curriculum learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article evaluates the information content of different lengths of precipitation nowcasting tasks using mutual information and proposes two strategies: a mutual information-based reweighting strategy (MIR) and a mutual information-based training strategy (TSS). These strategies effectively improve the forecasting accuracy for convective scenarios while maintaining prediction performance for rainless scenarios and overall nowcasting image quality, and can be applied to various state-of-the-art models.
Precipitation nowcasting has long been a challenging problem in meteorology. While recent studies have introduced deep neural networks into this area and achieved promising results, these models still struggle with the rapid evolution of rainfall and extremely imbalanced data distribution, resulting in poor forecasting performance for convective scenarios. In this article, we evaluate the amount of information in different precipitation nowcasting tasks of varying lengths using mutual information. We propose two strategies: the mutual information-based reweighting strategy (MIR) and a mutual information-based training strategy (time superimposing strategy (TSS)). MIR reinforces neural network models to improve the forecasting accuracy for convective scenarios while maintaining prediction performance for rainless scenarios and overall nowcasting image quality. The TSS strategy enhances the model's forecasting performance by adopting a curriculum learning-like method. Although the proposed strategies are simple, the experimental results show that they are effective and can be applied to various state-of-the-art models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available