4.7 Article

Linear and Nonlinear Land Use Regression Approach for Modelling PM2.5 Concentration in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia during Peak Hours

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs15051174

Keywords

fine particulate matter; Linear and Nonlinear LUR model; air pollution; Ulaanbaatar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Air pollution in Ulaanbaatar, especially in the ger area, has become a serious health challenge for the citizens. This study aims to map the daytime dispersion of PM2.5 using Linear and Nonlinear Land Use Regression models.
In recent decades, air pollution in Ulaanbaatar has become a challenge regarding the health of the citizens of Ulaanbaatar, due to coal combustion in the ger area. Households burn fuel for cooking and to warm their houses in the morning and evening. This creates a difference between daytime and nighttime air pollution levels. The accurate mapping of air pollution and assessment of exposure to air pollution have thus become important study objects for researchers. The city center is where most air quality monitoring stations are located, but they are unable to monitor every residential region, particularly the ger area, which is where most particulate matter pollution originates. Due to this circumstance, it is difficult to construct an LUR model for the entire capital city's residential region. This study aims to map peak PM2.5 dispersion during the day using the Linear and Nonlinear Land Use Regression (LUR) model (Multi-Linear Regression Model (MLRM) and Generalized Additive Model (GAM)) for Ulaanbaatar, with monitoring station measurements and mobile device (DUST TRUK II) measurements. LUR models are frequently used to map small-scale spatial variations in element levels for various types of air pollution, based on measurements and geographical predictors. PM2.5 measurement data were collected and analyzed in the R statistical software and ArcGIS. The results showed the dispersion map MLRM R-2 = 0.84, adjusted R-2 = 0.83, RMSE = 53.25 mu g/m(3) and GAM R-2 = 0.89, and adjusted R-2 = 0.87, RMSE = 44 mu g/m(3). In order to validate the models, the LOOCV technique was run on both the MLRM and GAM. Their performance was also high, with LOOCV R-2 = 0.83, RMSE = 55.6 mu g/m(3), MAE = 38.7 mu g/m(3), and GAM LOOCV R-2 = 0.77, RMSE = 65.5 mu g/m(3), MAE = 47.7 mu g/m(3). From these results, the LUR model's performance is high, especially the GAM model, which works better than MRLM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available