Journal
REMOTE SENSING
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs15112703
Keywords
carbon storage; InVEST model; Geo-information Tupu; land use transition; Poyang Lake basin
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Carbon storage is crucial for the global carbon cycle and climate change mitigation. Understanding the relationship between land use change and carbon storage is essential for carbon neutrality and sustainable development. However, limited studies have quantitatively evaluated the contributions of different land use transitions to carbon storage change, hindering effective land use management. This study assessed carbon storage in the rapidly urbanizing Poyang Lake basin using the InVEST model and identified key land use transitions using the Geo-information Tupu method. The findings highlighted the significant carbon loss caused by built-up land expansion and provided valuable insights for land use policies aiming at carbon neutrality and sustainable development in the region.
Carbon storage plays an important role in the global carbon cycle and climate change mitigation. Understanding the relationship between land use change and carbon storage can significantly contribute to carbon neutrality and sustainable development. However, most previous studies only analyze the carbon storage change due to land use change, while few studies quantitatively evaluate the contributions of various land use transitions (LUTs) to carbon storage change, which cannot provide enough information for land use management. In the context of rapid urbanization and ecological conservation, the Poyang Lake basin (PYLB) has experienced dramatic land use change, which has significantly affected local carbon storage. Therefore, this study used the InVEST model to evaluate carbon storage in the PYLB from 1990 to 2020. Then, the Geo-information Tupu method was used to quantify the contributions of various LUTs to carbon storage change and identify the key LUTs. The results showed that carbon storage in PYLB decreased by 17.26 Tg from 1990 to 2020. The carbon gain was mainly attributed to transitions from 'farmland to forestland' (36.87%), 'grassland to forestland' (22.58%), and 'farmland to water' (15.89%). In contrast, the transitions from 'farmland to built-up land', 'forestland to built-up land', and 'forestland to grassland' contributed 39.94%, 28.06%, and 13.25% to carbon loss, respectively. Massive carbon loss caused by built-up land expansion should attract attention. This study can provide references for the formulation and optimization of land use policies to achieve carbon neutrality and sustainable development in the PYLB.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available