4.7 Article

Using Artificial Neural Networks to Assess Earthquake Vulnerability in Urban Blocks of Tehran

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs15051248

Keywords

vulnerability; earthquake; risk assessment; artificial neural networks; Tehran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study is to assess the vulnerability of urban blocks to earthquakes in Tehran using an artificial neural network-multi-layer perceptron. The study classified earthquake vulnerability criteria into three categories and inputted them into the neural network. The results showed that 29% of Tehran's total area is extremely vulnerable to earthquakes, with factors such as proximity to fault lines, high population density, and environmental factors gaining higher importance scores.
The purpose of this study is to assess the vulnerability of urban blocks to earthquakes for Tehran as a city built on geological faults using an artificial neural network-multi-layer perceptron (ANN-MLP). Therefore, we first classified earthquake vulnerability evaluation criteria into three categories: exposure, sensitivity, and adaptability capacity attributed to a total of 16 spatial criteria, which were inputted into the neural network. To train the neural network and compute an earthquake vulnerability map, we used a combined Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) process with 167 vulnerable locations as training data, of which 70% (117 points) were used for training, and 30% (50 points) were used for testing and validation. The Mean Average Error (MAE) of the implemented neural network was 0.085, which proves the efficacy of the designed model. The results showed that 29% of Tehran's total area is extremely vulnerable to earthquakes. Our factor importance analysis showed that factors such as proximity to fault lines, high population density, and environmental factors gained higher importance scores for earthquake vulnerability assessment of the given case study. This methodical approach and the choice of data and methods can provide insight into scaling up the study to other regions. In addition, the resultant outcomes can help decision makers and relevant stakeholders to mitigate risks through resilience building.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available