4.2 Article

Poor quality of sleep in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes and its association with lack of glycemic control

Journal

PRIMARY CARE DIABETES
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 155-160

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2023.01.011

Keywords

Sleep quality; Glycated hemoglobin A1c; Glycemic control; Obesity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the association between sleep quality and lack of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients. The results showed a high prevalence of poor sleep quality and lack of glycemic control in the study population. Poor sleep quality was found to significantly double the risk of lack of glycemic control, even in the presence of other risk factors such as napping, diabetes duration, insulin use, and high diastolic blood pressure.
Aims: To determine the association between sleep quality and lack of glycemic control in a Mexican population of type 2 diabetes patients.Methods: Cross-sectional study. Two hundred two patients between 20 and 60 years old with a previous diagnosis of diabetes were included. Sleep quality was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and lack of gly-cemic control as a glycated hemoglobin A1c level >= 7 %. Univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression were performed.Results: The study population showed poor sleep quality and a lack of glycemic control of 70.3 % and 69.8 %, respectively. The prevalence of patients with both conditions was 52.5 %. In multivariate analysis, poor sleep quality was significantly associated with a lack of glycemic control (OR = 2.3, p = 0.030). Other associated variables were napping (p = 0.015), diabetes duration (p = 0.011), insulin use (p = 0.024), and diastolic blood pressure >= 85 mmHg (p = 0.029).Conclusions: The prevalence of lack of glycemic control in the study population is high. Poor sleep quality significantly doubles the risk of lack of glycemic control, even in the presence of other risk factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available