4.7 Article

Application of Chitosan-Based Molecularly Imprinted Polymer in Development of Electrochemical Sensor for p-Aminophenol Determination

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15081818

Keywords

molecularly imprinted polymer; screen-printed carbon electrode; cyclic voltammetry; square wave voltammetry; p-aminophenol; chitosan; glutaraldehyde; sodium tripolyphosphate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs) modified screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) was developed for the determination of p-aminophenol (p-AP). The MIP was prepared using p-AP as a template, chitosan as a base polymer, and glutaraldehyde and sodium tripolyphosphate as crosslinkers. The results showed that the MIP selectively accumulated analytes on the electrode surface, and MIP with glutaraldehyde as a crosslinker increased the signal.
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs) have specific recognition capabilities and have been widely used for electrochemical sensors with high selectivity. In this study, an electrochemical sensor was developed for the determination of p-aminophenol (p-AP) by modifying the screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) with chitosan-based MIP. The MIP was made from p-AP as a template, chitosan (CH) as a base polymer, and glutaraldehyde and sodium tripolyphosphate as the crosslinkers. MIP characterization was conducted based on membrane surface morphology, FT-IR spectrum, and electrochemical properties of the modified SPCE. The results showed that the MIP was able to selectively accumulate analytes on the electrode surface, in which MIP with glutaraldehyde as a crosslinker was able to increase the signal. Under optimum conditions, the anodic peak current from the sensor increased linearly in the range of 0.5-35 mu M p-AP concentration, with sensitivity of (3.6 +/- 0.1) mu A/mu M, detection limit (S/N = 3) of (2.1 +/- 0.1) mu M, and quantification limit of (7.5 +/- 0.1) mu M. In addition, the developed sensor exhibited high selectivity with an accuracy of (94.11 +/- 0.01)%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available