4.7 Review

Biomaterials as Implants in the Orthopedic Field for Regenerative Medicine: Metal versus Synthetic Polymers

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15122601

Keywords

orthopedic; bone; biodegradable; corrosion resistance; biocompatibility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with bone fractures or joint diseases often require implants that can mimic the function of natural bone. Metallic and synthetic polymer biomaterials, such as stainless steel, titanium, polyethene, and PEEK, are commonly used for load-bearing bone fractures. This review compares the classification, properties, and application of these biomaterials.
Patients suffering bone fractures in different parts of the body require implants that will enable similar function to that of the natural bone that they are replacing. Joint diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis) also require surgical intervention with implants such as hip and knee joint replacement. Biomaterial implants are utilized to fix fractures or replace parts of the body. For the majority of these implant cases, either metal or polymer biomaterials are chosen in order to have a similar functional capacity to the original bone material. The biomaterials that are employed most often for implants of bone fracture are metals such as stainless steel and titanium, and polymers such as polyethene and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). This review compared metallic and synthetic polymer implant biomaterials that can be employed to secure load-bearing bone fractures due to their ability to withstand the mechanical stresses and strains of the body, with a focus on their classification, properties, and application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available