4.7 Review

The Additive Manufacturing Approach to Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Microfluidic Devices: Review and Future Directions

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15081926

Keywords

polydimethylsiloxane; 3D printing; microfabrication; microfluidics; post treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a comprehensive review on the fabrication of PDMS microfluidic devices using additive manufacturing (AM) processes. Two approaches, direct printing and indirect printing, are classified. The focus of the study is on the printed mold approach, which involves casting PDMS materials with a printed mold. The paper also identifies knowledge gaps, proposes future work, and develops a novel classification of AM processes.
This paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature for fabricating PDMS microfluidic devices by employing additive manufacturing (AM) processes. AM processes for PDMS microfluidic devices are first classified into (i) the direct printing approach and (ii) the indirect printing approach. The scope of the review covers both approaches, though the focus is on the printed mold approach, which is a kind of the so-called replica mold approach or soft lithography approach. This approach is, in essence, casting PDMS materials with the mold which is printed. The paper also includes our on-going effort on the printed mold approach. The main contribution of this paper is the identification of knowledge gaps and elaboration of future work toward closing the knowledge gaps in fabrication of PDMS microfluidic devices. The second contribution is the development of a novel classification of AM processes from design thinking. There is also a contribution in clarifying confusion in the literature regarding the soft lithography technique; this classification has provided a consistent ontology in the sub-field of the fabrication of microfluidic devices involving AM processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available