4.7 Article

Influence of Post-Processing on the Properties of Multi-Material Parts Obtained by Material Projection AM

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15092089

Keywords

additive manufacturing; multi-material; material projection; post-processing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The complexity and material compatibility of 3D printing create a new paradigm in design and manufacturing. However, standardization is lacking, necessitating characterization studies to fully utilize the advantages in functional parts. Post-processing is crucial for part finishing, and different methods can affect part quality similar to other process parameters.
The great geometric complexity that additive manufacturing allows in parts, together with the possibility of combining several materials in the same part, establishes a new design and manufacturing paradigm. Despite the interest of many leading sectors, the lack of standardization still makes it necessary to carry out characterization work to enjoy these advantages in functional parts. In many of these techniques, the process does not end with the end of the machine cycle, but different post-processing must be carried out to consider the part finished. It has been found that the type of post process applied can have a similar effect on part quality as other further studied process parameters. In this work, the material projection technique was used to manufacture multi-material parts combining resins with different mechanical properties. The influence of different post-processing on the tensile behavior of these parts was analyzed. The results show the detrimental effect of ultrasonic treatment with isopropyl alcohol in the case of the more flexible resin mixtures, being advisable to use ultrasonic with mineral oil or furnace treatment. For more rigid mixtures, the furnace is the best option, although the other post-processing techniques do not significantly deteriorate their performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available