4.6 Article

Depression and anxiety in people with cognitive impairment and dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Journal

PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004162

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to examine the association between cognitive impairment and mental health changes during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as whether these associations varied according to sociodemographic inequality. Using data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, the study found that depression and anxiety worsened for individuals with no cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment during the pandemic. However, wealth and education appeared to have a stronger impact on depression and anxiety than cognitive impairment.
Author summary Why was this study done? Early research conducted after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic suggested that the pandemic was having a negative impact on mental health.Older people with cognitive impairment or dementia are more vulnerable to the negative impacts of the pandemic, and they tend to have worse mental health than older people with no cognitive impairment.This study was done to test whether changes in mental health over time through the pandemic was associated with cognitive impairment, along with whether associations varied according to key sources of sociodemographic inequality. What did the researchers do and find? This study draws on the richness of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, a study of people aged 50+ in England, which provides a robust way of assessing cognitive function and mental health (in terms of depression and anxiety) and includes measurements before the pandemic (2018/2019) and at 2 time points during it (June/July and November/December 2020).Using a statistical approach called conditional growth curve modelling, we found that depression and anxiety worsened for people with no cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment between 2018/2019 and November/December 2020. Average depression scores increased from 1.17 to 2.03 and 1.30 to 2.16, respectively, while anxiety ratings increased from 2.20 to 2.85 and 2.48 to 3.14.When using a measure for likely clinical depression, we found the probability of clinical depression also increase for people with no cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment between 2018/2019 and November/December 2020, from 0.110 to 0.206 and 0.139 to 0.234, respectively.In terms of inequalities, wealth and education appeared to be stronger drivers for depression and anxiety, respectively, than cognitive impairment. For example, those with no impairment in the richest two-thirds scored 1.76 for depression in June/July, compared to 2.01 for those with no impairment in the poorest third and 2.03 for those with impairment in the poorest third. What do these findings mean? Our findings suggest a convergence in mental health over time among different cognitive function groups, with similar outcomes in November/December 2020 for those with no impairment, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia.Health professionals who provide mental health support to older people in the community should be aware that increasing demand for support is likely to come from those with no or mild cognitive impairment.With little significant change in mental health for those with dementia, those providing support will need to ensure this group continues to access services despite competing demands from those with no or mild cognitive impairment. BackgroundSome studies have identified declines in mental health during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in different age groups, including older people. As anxiety and depression are common neuropsychiatric symptoms among people with cognitive impairment, the mental health experiences of older people during the pandemic should take cognitive function into consideration, along with assessments made prior to the pandemic. This study addresses evidence gaps to test whether changes in depression and anxiety among older people through the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with cognitive impairment. It also investigates whether associations varied according to key sources of sociodemographic inequality. Methods and findingsUsing data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) collected from 2018/2019 to November/December 2020, we estimated changes in depression and anxiety for people aged 50+ in England across 3 cognitive function groups: no impairment, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Conditional growth curve models were estimated for continuous measures over 3 time points (N = 5,286), with mixed-effects logistic regression used for binary measures. All models adjusted for demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, and cohabiting partnership), socioeconomics (education, wealth, and employment status), geography (urban/rural and English region), and health (self-rated and the presence of multimorbidity).We found that depression (measured with CES-D score) worsened from 2018/2019 to November/December 2020 for people with mild cognitive impairment (1.39 (95% CI: 1.29 to 1.49) to 2.16 (2.02 to 2.30)) or no impairment (1.17 (95%CI: 1.12 to 1.22) to 2.03 (1.96 to 2.10)). Anxiety, using a single-item rating of 0 to 10 also worsened among those with mild cognitive impairment (2.48 (2.30 to 2.66) to 3.14 (2.95 to 3.33)) or no impairment (2.20 (2.11 to 2.28) to 2.85 (2.77 to 2.95)). No statistically significant increases were found for those with dementia. Using a clinical cutoff for likely depression (CES-D >= 4), we found statistically significant increases in the probability of depression between 2018/2019 and November/December 2020 for those with no impairment (0.110 (0.099 to 0.120) to 0.206 (0.191 to 0.222)) and mild impairment (0.139 (0.120 to 0.159) to 0.234 (0.204 to 0.263)).We also found that differences according to cognitive function that existed before the pandemic were no longer present by June/July 2020, and there were no statistically significant differences in depression or anxiety among cognitive groups in November/December 2020. Wealth and education appeared to be stronger drivers for depression and anxiety, respectively, than cognitive impairment. For example, those with no impairment in the richest two-thirds scored 1.76 (1.69 to 1.82) for depression in June/July, compared to 2.01 (1.91 to 2.12) for those with no impairment in the poorest third and 2.03 (1.87 to 2.19) for those with impairment in the poorest third. Results may be limited by the small number of people with dementia and are generalizable only to people living in the community, not to those in institutional care settings. ConclusionsOur findings suggest a convergence in mental health across cognitive function groups during the pandemic. This suggests mental health services will need to meet an increased demand from older adults, especially those not living with cognitive impairment. Further, with little significant change among those with dementia, their existing need for support will remain; policymakers and care practitioners should ensure this group continues to have equitable access to mental health support.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available