☆ 4.5 Article

Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Clinical Neurology

Minimally invasive endoscopy in spine surgery: where are we now?

Khanathip Jitpakdee et al.

Summary: Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is a minimally invasive surgical technique that offers comparable efficacy and safety with less collateral damage compared to conventional surgery. This article provides a comprehensive review and updates of ESS, including nomenclature, technical evolution, bibliometric analysis, recent changes in the spine communities, the prevailing of biportal endoscopy, and the future of endoscopic spine surgery.

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

A Comparative Study of a New Retractor-Assisted WILTSE TLIF, MIS-TLIF, and Traditional PLIF for Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Huanan Liu et al.

Summary: Comparing the clinical efficacy of a new retractor-assisted Wiltse TLIF, minimally invasive TLIF, and traditional PLIF, it was found that the new retractor-assisted Wiltse TLIF is a more convenient and minimally invasive surgical method, which can reduce intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and bedridden time, while traditional PLIF has higher back pain VAS scores, lower ODI and JOA scores.

ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Surgery

Comparison of short-term efficacy of MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar diseases

Zhiwei Song et al.

Summary: The study compared the short-term clinical outcomes and complications of MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar diseases and found no significant difference in clinical efficacy and safety between the two approaches. However, MIS-TLIF was significantly better in terms of operation time, hospitalization cost, and fluoroscopy time, while Endo-LIF was significantly better in terms of intraoperative blood loss.

FRONTIERS IN SURGERY (2022)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Seong Son et al.

Summary: Endo-LIF has favorable immediate outcomes in terms of blood loss and back pain compared to MIS-TLIF, but it has a longer operation time and limited surgical indication.

JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Surgery

Comparison of extreme lateral approach with posterior approach in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: A meta-analysis of clinical and imaging findings

Xiaoping Mu et al.

Summary: A meta-analysis comparing clinical and imaging findings between XLIF and PF for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases showed that both approaches have equally promising clinical effectiveness, but XLIF is better at reducing intraoperative blood loss and achieving postoperative local sagittal alignment. However, a higher incidence of postoperative complications was detected in the XLIF group.

SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Hao Zhang et al.

Summary: This study compared the preliminary postoperative outcomes of Endo-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis, finding that Endo-TLIF had less blood loss and shorter ambulation time, with significant early improvement. There were no significant differences in terms of interbody fusion rates between the two groups, and no serious postoperative complications were observed.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Epidural Anesthesia: Technical Note and Initial Clinical Experience with One-Year Follow-Up

Chao Jiang et al.

Summary: The study introduced and evaluated the early clinical outcomes of Endo-PLIF technique with epidural anesthesia for single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases. All patients underwent successful single-segment Endo-PLIF surgery and showed significant improvements in pain scores and quality of life during the 12-month follow-up.

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Clinical Research and Technique Note of TLIF by Wiltse Approach for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar

Yong-Ming Jin et al.

Summary: The Wiltse Approach TLIF significantly reduces damage to paravertebral muscles and the postoperative incidence of chronic low back pain. Patients experience significant improvement in pain and disability after surgery, with shorter incision length and operative time compared to the conventional open approach.

ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy at the L5-S1 level

Seong Son et al.

PLOS ONE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Primary MIS TLIF and MIS TLIF With Revision Decompression

Benjamin Khechen et al.

SPINE (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Engineering, Biomedical

Device solutions for a challenging spine surgery: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF)

Arash J. Sayari et al.

EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Engineering, Biomedical

Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comprehensive review

Yong Ahn et al.

EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up

John Paul G. Kolcun et al.

NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF

David H. Ge et al.

SPINE (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Surgery

Effects of three common lumbar interbody fusion procedures for degenerative disc disease: A network meta-analysis of prospective studies

En-Yuan Lin et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

Comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single segmental lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimum two-year follow up

Ai-Min Wu et al.

ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis

Lei Xie et al.

CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion without general anesthesia: initial clinical experience with 1-year follow-up

Michael Y. Wang et al.

NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Surgery

Endoscopic transforaminal decompression, interbody fusion, and percutaneous pedicle screw implantation of the lumbar spine: A case series report

Said G. Osman

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (2012)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.