4.6 Article

Can food security and low carbon be achieved simultaneously?-An empirical analysis of the mechanisms influencing the carbon footprint of potato and corn cultivation in irrigation areas

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 1230-1243

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2023.02.010

Keywords

food security-climate nexus; irrigated agriculture; carbon footprint; smallholder farmer; path analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Irrigated agriculture has significantly increased food production and security, but its impact on global climate change is debated. This interdisciplinary study combines carbon emissions accounting with econometric models to analyze the factors influencing the carbon footprint of smallholder crop cultivation in irrigation reform pilot areas. The results show that irrigation reforms have led to a lower crop carbon footprint and are influenced by multiple factors such as project implementation, technology adoption, management practices, and yield effects.
Irrigated agriculture has tripled since 1950, accounting for 20% of the global arable land and 40% of food production. Irrigated agriculture increases food security yet has controversial implications for global climate change. Most previous studies have calculated carbon emissions and their composition in irrigated areas using the engineering approach to lifecycle assessment. By combining life cycle assessment (LCA)-based carbon emissions accounting with econometric models such as multiple linear regression and structural equation modeling (SEM), we conducted an interdisciplinary study to identify the influencing factors and internal mechanisms of the carbon footprint (CFP) of smallholder crop cultivation on irrigation reform pilot areas. To this end, we investigated corn and potato production data in the 2019-2020 crop years for 852 plots of 345 rural households in six villages (two irrigation agriculture pilot villages and four surrounding villages as controls) in Southwest China. The crop CFP in the irrigation agriculture pilot areas was significantly lower than in non-reform areas. Irrigation reforms mainly impacted the crop CFP through four intermediary effects: the project (implementation of field irrigation channels), technology (improving adoption of new irrigation technologies), management (proper irrigation operation and maintenance), and yield effects. All effects inhibited the CFP, except for the project effect that promotes carbon emissions. Among them, yield increase has the greatest impact on reducing CFP, followed by management and technology effects. Furthermore, planting practices, individual characteristics, and plot quality significantly impacted the crop CFP. This study has policy implications for understanding the food security-climate nexus in the food production industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available