4.2 Article

Public purse, private service: The perceptions of public funding models of Australian independent speech-language pathologists

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2023.2213864

Keywords

qualitative research; thematic analysis; public funding models; speech-language pathology; private practice; health-economic objectives

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the perceptions of speech-language pathologists in accessing public funding models for children and young persons with communication and swallowing needs in independent practice in Australia. The research findings revealed that the current funding provisions do not align with evidence-based speech-language pathology management, highlighting the need for equitable and efficient funding that is acceptable to stakeholders. Further research is recommended to identify PFMs that facilitate access to speech-language pathology services and promote optimal outcomes.
PurposeHealth funding provisions supported by governments are pivotal for families accessing independent speech-language pathology services in Australia. Little is known of the facilitators and barriers that exist for accessing public funding for speech-language pathology services through independent providers. This study aimed to investigate and describe the perceptions of speech-language pathologists in accessing public funding models (PFMs) for children and young persons with communication and swallowing needs within Australian independent practice.MethodSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with twenty independent speech-language pathologists who had experience of PFMs in Australia. Digitally recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and subjected to thematic analysis.ResultData analysis revealed five superordinate and eighteen subordinate themes. The five superordinate themes were: (a) accessibility in securing funding provisions; (b) time as a commodity; (c) incongruence between funding provisions and speech-language pathology evidence; (d) trust as a multifaceted quality; and (e) consequences of PFMs.ConclusionThis original and timely research offers perceptive descriptions of the multifaceted facilitators and barriers for families seeking to access public funding for independent speech-language pathology services in Australia. Research findings illuminate challenges for the speech-language pathology profession. Accessibility to funding was identified as a major issue. Research findings suggest that current funding provisions do not align with the dosage required for evidence-based speech-language pathology management. Further, this research has highlighted the need for funding to be equitable, acceptable to stakeholders, and for services to be delivered in an efficient and sustainable manner. Future research is recommended to understand which Australian PFMs: (a) facilitate consumer access to speech-language pathology services; (b) enrich consumer experiences; and (c) align with scientific evidence to promote optimal outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available