4.1 Article

Changes in knee flexion-extension performance and hamstring-to-quadriceps ratio during a fatiguing isokinetic protocol in male professional futsal players

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2023.2221501

Keywords

Injury & Prevention; Strength; Team sport; Training; Resistance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study verified the effects of high-speed isokinetic fatigue protocol on knee flexion and extension performance and hamstring-to-quadriceps ratio in male professional futsal players. The results showed reductions in knee flexion and extension performance and a decrease in the hamstring-to-quadriceps ratio in fatigue conditions.
Knee flexion (KF) and extension (KE) performance and hamstring-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratio are used to estimate injury risk and readiness to return to sport. However, the traditional measures (i.e. non-fatigued state and by peak torque [PT]) may not reflect the thigh and knee injury conditions (i.e. high-speed actions and fatigue presence). We verified the effects of a high-speed isokinetic fatigue protocol (30 consecutive KF and KE concentric contractions at 300 degrees/s) on KF and KE performance and H:Q ratios assessed through different parameters (i.e. PT, work, average and peak power) in male professional futsal players (n = 17). A significant (p < 0.01) time x muscle group interaction was verified. There were reductions (p < 0.01) in KF by PT (84.79 +/- 15.05 to 50.29 +/- 15.29 Nm), work (87.28 +/- 14.46 to 39.00 +/- 13.83 Nm), average power (227.81 +/- 39.31 to 104.75 +/- 31.24 W) and peak power (383.40 +/- 59.90 to 191.39 +/- 48.35 W). Similarly, KE performance decreased (p < 0.01) for all parameters (PT: 131.36 +/- 16.05 to 81.61 +/- 9.15 Nm; work: 148.83 +/- 20.88 to 90.72 +/- 11.89 Nm; average power: 148.83 +/- 20.88 to 90.72 +/- 11.89 W; peak power: 664.74 +/- 85.32 to 398.38 +/- 42.42 W). KF (-55.18 +/- 13.91% to -40.94 +/- 12.66%) showed a higher percentage decrease than KE (-40.46 +/- 7.38% to -37.45 +/- 6.61%). Finally, reductions (p < 0.01) in H:Q ratio by work, average and peak power but not by PT (p = 0.25) were verified. The tested methods can provide additional information about the athlete's condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available